Govyn vs TealTiger
Feature comparison
| Feature | Govyn | TealTiger |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Lightweight proxy | Enterprise SaaS platform |
| Target audience | Developers / DevOps | Enterprise / Compliance |
| Budget enforcement | ||
| Policy-as-code (YAML) | GUI-based policies | |
| AI risk scoring | ||
| Compliance frameworks (SOC 2, etc.) | ||
| Model restrictions | ||
| Rate limiting | ||
| Approval workflows | ||
| Full replay logging | ||
| Self-hosted option | Enterprise only | |
| Open source | ||
| Setup time | 5 minutes | Weeks (enterprise onboarding) |
| Pricing | Free / from $29/mo | Enterprise contracts |
Architecture comparison
Sits between agent and provider at the HTTP level. Agents never see real API keys. No code changes required.
Cloud-hosted service with dashboard and agents.
When to use TealTiger
TealTiger is designed for enterprise organizations that need comprehensive AI governance beyond just the API layer. If you need built-in compliance framework mappings (SOC 2, ISO 27001, EU AI Act), AI risk scoring across your entire model inventory, executive dashboards for governance reporting, and multi-team policy management with role-based approvals, TealTiger's platform covers those enterprise requirements. It's a good fit for organizations with dedicated compliance teams who need a GUI-driven policy management system rather than YAML configuration files.
When to use Govyn
Govyn is the right choice when you need governance that developers actually adopt. Enterprise platforms like TealTiger require weeks of onboarding, procurement, and integration — Govyn takes five minutes. With policy-as-code in YAML (versioned in Git), your governance rules live alongside your application code and go through the same review process. Govyn is open source and free to self-host, with no enterprise sales cycle. For teams that want effective, real-time governance at the API level without the overhead of a full enterprise platform, Govyn delivers the controls that matter most — budgets, policies, rate limits, and audit trails — in a package developers will actually use.
Try Govyn in 5 minutes
Open source, MIT licensed. One command to start governing your AI agents.
Other comparisons
A Rust-based, Linux Foundation open-source data plane for agentic AI connectivity with native MCP and A2A protocol support, created by Solo.io.
A full-stack observability platform with logs, metrics, traces, and an AI Center for LLM call tracing, evaluation, cost analytics, and AI security posture management.
A SaaS platform for monitoring and optimizing AI agent usage with dashboards, cost analytics, and usage-based billing tools.
Explore more
SDK wrappers are door locks. Proxies are walls. A deep technical comparison of both governance architectures for AI agents in production.
INTEGRATIONAdd budget limits, policy enforcement, and full replay to LangChain agents using OpenAI. Five-minute setup, zero code changes.
POLICY TEMPLATEProtect production environments from AI agent damage. Model restrictions, rate limits, and approval gates for high-risk operations.
POLICY TEMPLATESet daily and monthly spending limits for AI agents. Prevent runaway costs with hard budget caps enforced at the proxy level.